On the 1st of June against Bhartiya Janata Party leader Suvendu Adhikari and his sibling Soumendu Adhikari for supposedly taking relief aid materials, an FIR complaint has been enrolled at the Police Station, Contai. Contai Municipality’s Board member Ratnadip Manna given a written FIR complaint and charging that, on the 29th of May, Himangshu and Pratap De take out a fully truck loaded canvas material from the Contai Municipality godown.
The FIR supposed that the demonstration was the aftereffect of criminal connivance drove by Bhartiya Janata Party leader Suvendu and Soumendu. The FIR further expresses that the supposed burglary was completed with the assistance of the Central Police Forces. It is additionally referenced in the complaint, alongside different individuals from the Contai Municipality, who went to check the godown on getting the data, they faced Himangshu.
When asked, he expressed that the canvas materials were taken according to the directions of Suvendu and Soumendu two BJP leaders. The complaint stated that “On the 29th of May at noon according to the bearing of BJP leader Suvendu and his brother Soumendu Adhikari and His brother was the head of Kanthi Municipality in past, Tribal Govt whose assessed esteem is around lakhs, was detracted from Contai Municipality godown by strongly and illicitly opening locks”.
On the 5th of June, BJP leader Suvendu’s close person Rakhal Bera was detained for supposedly misleading individuals with fake guarantees. Rakhal Bera was arrested by Police Station, Manicktala dependent on a Sujit Dey’s FIR. As per Kolkata Police, Rakhal Bera was important for a criminal intrigue with Chanchal Nandi and a couple of others and supposedly coordinated a phony job racket at some point in the month of July and September 2 years ago.
Sujit Dey’s FIR had moved toward the couple looking for a Job. “The pair purportedly guaranteed Dey with a job in Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways. The denounced individual supposedly took two lakhs rupees in return for the job work. Nonetheless, the FIR asserts that the blamed people misused the whole sum and did not give a job in return”.